Walt Disney Family Museum Profiled in NY Times

I so want to have good things to say about the Walt Disney Family Museum. I’m sure the exhibits will be top notch and that the presentation of Walt Disney’s life will be the most fair and balanced yet.

See, I tried. There are, however, two major flaws in the project that are thrown clearly into the light by this recent NY Times article. The museum is located too far away from the central parts of Walt Disney’s life and its capacity is inappropriately low to achieve the museum’s goals. I believe the article shows that Diane Disney Miller is too close to the subject to objectively understand the legacy of her father and is selling it short with this museum.

The first issue is the location. In the article it’s implied that they chose the location of San Francisco to help make the distinction clear between the man and his company. Also part of the decision was the close location to Miller’s estate. This is like setting up a museum for Monet or Picasso in China and no where else. The primary work and exhibits for Monet and Picasso were in France and in both cases former residences were used to showcase their lives and work. You learn their stories by walking where they walked, seeing the same flowers and models they painted.

Walt Disney’s life story had almost no San Francisco in it. He certainly never worked or lived there. Although he was a man of the world, he is a key part of the story of Hollywood and Southern California being the first to open an animation studio there. When you divorce the man from his surroundings it is impossible to fully appreciate his place in them. You can’t help but tell a different story.

Locating the museum in San Francisco will have the drastic effect of limiting the number of people who get to learn about Walt Disney via the museum. But apparently that was part of the plan too. The Presidio location is small and attendance will be limited to just 240 people an hour. That’s much smaller hourly capacity than any Disney theme park attraction. If one of the goals of the museum is to change what family members consider to be wrong perceptions about Walt Disney’s life, wouldn’t it behoove them to choose a location that will reach the most people?

In the end, there is only one proper location for a Museum about Walt Disney – Southern California. It’s where Walt spent the bulk of his life, met his wife, opened his most successful endeavors, and changed the world. Alas it’s too late to change the course of the Walt Disney Family Museum. It’s set to open in October.  I’m guessing I won’t be getting an invitation.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
This entry was posted in Uncle Walt, Walt Disney Family and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Walt Disney Family Museum Profiled in NY Times

  1. Ken Pellman says:

    I can understand wanting to have it close to the Miller estate. If not in Anaheim or Orlando or Burbank, another place that could have made sense is downtown Los Angeles, at Los Angeles County Music Center, perhaps near the Walt Disney Concert Hall. That would avoid throngs of theme park goers passing through.

  2. I’m not happy with the Walt Disney Family Museum. – http://is.gd/q4jN – While I’m sure the exhibits will be outstanding, the location sucks!

  3. TheYeti says:

    The Presidio is really a beautiful section of SF, and I’d love to visit it again. I can’t imagine how much they’re paying in rent and taxes for that property. George Lucas’ Letterman Digital Arts Center is nearby, and he pays something like $1 million a year. Of course, the Walt Disney Family Museum is A LOT smaller.

  4. Mark Baker says:

    If it were down here in Southern California, you can bet I’d be visiting it quite regularly. But I won’t be able to get up to San Francisco often enough to truly visit it.

  5. carlo says:

    “But I won’t be able to get up to San Francisco often enough to truly visit it.”

    What does that even mean? To truly visit it? How much time do you want to spend at this museum, more then a day?

    Such whiners! Reading rants like this makes me understand why Disney stopped trying to appeal to us fan boys and girls.

    I think the museum is a great idea and I can’t wait to visit it. John, I hope you don’t get an invitation so I don’t have to listen to you complain about the color of the sky.

  6. Robin says:

    Excuse me, but I have been wanting Disneyland to be near me in Northern California all of my life (55 years!!) and now finally there is this great museum that will be 40 minutes away that I can visit on regular basis like all the people in Southern California, Central Florida, etc!! I have to travel to get those places so why can’t other people travel to beautiful San Francisco which is in the top ten tourist sites to visit.The Presido and beautiful and pays the respect to an individual of Walt Disney’s high caliber.

  7. Pingback: 1963 Disneyland Aerial Photo | The Disney Blog

Comments are closed.