Tangled – The Second Trailer

Oooh. Wow. Me likey.

One question though. What happened to the possessive? Disney Tangled? Are we to believe that Disney itself is tangled? Shouldn’t it be Disney’s Tangled? I’m confused. Maybe it should be Disney Presents Tangled? But then shouldn’t it be Walt Disney Presents Tangled? Someone get Disney marketing a copy of the MLA grammar guide.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
This entry was posted in Animation and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Tangled – The Second Trailer

  1. Doopey says:

    Unfortunately, that just seems to be the new branding that they are using on all Disney films. Take a look at the posters for “Tron: Legacy” or “Tangled” or “Secretariat” or some of the posters for “Alice in Wonderland.” They all just have the “Disney” logo above the title. No more “Walt Disney Pictures Presents” or “Disney’s” or anything like that. I first noticed it during some of the commercials for “Princess and the Frog” last year. I really don’t like it. Makes it look kinda cheap.

  2. Have you seen the second trailer for Tangled? (Was: Rapunzel (Was: Rapunzel Unbraided)) http://bit.ly/cIn0Ac I have a question!

  3. Pingback: AH

  4. Pingback: Todd Perlmutter

  5. Pingback: Alltop Disney

  6. Pingback: WDWFans

  7. You mean like how they changed the name of the theme park to Disney California Adventure?

  8. Have you seen the second trailer for Tangled? (Was: Rapunzel (Was: Rapunzel Unbraided)) http://bit.ly/cIn0Ac I have a question for Disney!

  9. Pingback: AH

Comments are closed.