<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fallen Princesses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedisneyblog.com/2009/06/16/fallen-princesses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedisneyblog.com/2009/06/16/fallen-princesses/</link>
	<description>Disney News and Information -- by fans, for fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://thedisneyblog.com/2009/06/16/fallen-princesses/comment-page-1/#comment-15596</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedisneyblog.com/?p=6932#comment-15596</guid>
		<description>I actually thought the Rapunzel one was kind of a low blow.  That was my least favorite.  But I loved the Jasmine one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually thought the Rapunzel one was kind of a low blow.  That was my least favorite.  But I loved the Jasmine one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fallen Princesses &#171; Broke Hoedown</title>
		<link>http://thedisneyblog.com/2009/06/16/fallen-princesses/comment-page-1/#comment-15595</link>
		<dc:creator>Fallen Princesses &#171; Broke Hoedown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedisneyblog.com/?p=6932#comment-15595</guid>
		<description>[...] far) can be found at JPG Magazine. Hat tips to Mr. Broke Hoedown for sending me the link, and to The Disney Blog (who rightly praised the Rapunzel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] far) can be found at JPG Magazine. Hat tips to Mr. Broke Hoedown for sending me the link, and to The Disney Blog (who rightly praised the Rapunzel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://thedisneyblog.com/2009/06/16/fallen-princesses/comment-page-1/#comment-15592</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedisneyblog.com/?p=6932#comment-15592</guid>
		<description>Wow ... well done. Totally different twist. (Not a big fan of the Disney photos by Leibovitz. Seemed silly. Much money spent on an ad campaign that to me didn&#039;t serve a purpose - other than a paycheck for the photographer.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8230; well done. Totally different twist. (Not a big fan of the Disney photos by Leibovitz. Seemed silly. Much money spent on an ad campaign that to me didn&#8217;t serve a purpose &#8211; other than a paycheck for the photographer.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
