Winds of Change in the 100 acre wood

Insidepooh
Okay. Sit down. Take a deep breath. Then read this.


Maybe it’s just the impossibly cozy nature of the ‘hood, but for 80 years there has been no change in the resident line-up of the Hundred Acre Wood.

Guess who’s coming for honey? As part of a barrel-full of Winnie the Pooh anniversary events, Disney is working on a new animated series that will replace Christopher Robin with a "tomboyish" 6-year-old girl.  

Alright. You calm? This is so wrong I just don’t even know where to begin. Well, let’s start with one factual error in the story. First Disney does have a history of messing with the Pooh characters. They introduced Gopher in the 1977 ‘The Many Adventures of Winnie-the-Pooh’ movie. They have also tweaked the personalities and look of the characters overtime, call it artistic license. However, they have never gone as far as completely replacing one of the characters just to ‘raise ratings’. If they really wanted to raise ratings, why not by the rights to Calvin from Calvin & Hobbes and switch him out with Christopher Robin.

Disney over marketed Winnie-The-Pooh merchandise with his numbers surpassing Mickey Mouse’s at times. But the over exposure has done damage to the brand; Pooh themed stores in the theme parks have been shuttered or rethought, the new Pooh ride at Disneyland was mostly a dud, and the Heffalump movie (which introduced another new character, btw) has only done so-so for the company. Now they want to stretch sales at the expense of the brand. That’s never a wise thing to do.

I hope Disney re-evaluates before they clearly jump the shark with this move. Fine, introduce a new character to the 100 acre wood. The audience will eventually believe that someone else besides Christopher Robin can see his stuff animals as real. But don’t axe the young boy just because you think he won’t drive toy sales. Compliment him and respect the universe that A.A. Milne so carefully crafted. Overtime audiences will grow to accept the new character, as they have with Gopher, or the new character will fade away naturally. But don’t mess with the brand.

[ Tags: , , , , , , ]

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

4 thoughts on “Winds of Change in the 100 acre wood

  1. BlueMan

    Wasn’t the Many Adventures of Pooh a compilation of previously released toons?

    I think Gopher was introduced in the mid-to-late 60s.

  2. eeyore lover

    that is just so wrong. when will they learn if it is working don’t mess with it. this girl looks like she should be on an animated tree house show not winnie the pooh. the writers should be less concerned about ratings and more concerned with the integrity of the show and it’s life long faithful fans. plus winnie the pooh and christoper robin are best friends and if you replace him that changes the whole dynamics of the show.

  3. Steve Carras

    Actually, to John Frost’s comment,”Gopher”was introduced in the 1966 original “Pooh & The Honey Tree”.But it and the NEXT 3 (“Pooh…Blustery Day”, “Winnie..pooh..tigger too) were incorporated into that later 1977 feature.So it’sunderstandbale the brief release-date confusion.

Comments are closed.